Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., No. 14-1856 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2017)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1856
Decided
May 3, 2017
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ROMAG FASTENERS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FOSSIL, INC., FOSSIL STORES I, INC., MACY'S,

INC., MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., BELK,

INC., THE BON-TON STORES, INC., THE BON-TON DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., DILLARD'S, INC., NORDSTROM, INC., ZAPPOS.COM, INC., ZAPPOS

RETAIL, INC.,

Defendants-Cross-Appellants

2014-1856, 2014-1857

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in No. 3:10-cv-01827-JBA, 3:11-cv-00929- CFD, Judge Janet Bond Arterton.

Before DYK, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The court has received a certified copy of the judgment from the Clerk of the Supreme Court of the United States in Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., et al., No.2 2 ROMAG FASTENERS, INC. v. FOSSIL, INC.

16-202 (2017). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, vacated, and remanded for further consideration our March 31, 2016 judgment in light of SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC, 580 U.S. __ (2017).

The Supreme Court’s SCA Hygiene decision was solely concerned with the defense of laches against a claim for patent infringement damages and does not affect other aspects of our earlier opinion. Id. at 16. As such, we reinstate our earlier opinion except for section I. See WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp., 837 F.3d 1358, 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2016). Section I of our earlier opinion was specifically directed to the defense of laches.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The mandate issued on May 9, 2016, is hereby recalled and the appeal is reinstated.

(2) The June 27, 2014 judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut reducing Romag’s jury award patent damages by eighteen percent due to the defense of laches is vacated. Under the Supreme Court’s decision in SCA Hygiene, laches is not a defense to patent infringement within the statutory period.

(3) The case is remanded to that court to correct the damages judgment amount consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

(4) We hereby reinstate those aspects of our earlier decision and judgment set forth in sections II–III of our earlier opinion, 817 F.3d 782 (Fed. Cir. 2016), affirming the district court’s judgment declining to award Fossil’s profits, which were not affected by the Supreme Court’s order.

(5) Costs to neither party.

3ROMAG FASTENERS, INC.FOSSIL, INC. 3

FOR THE COURT

May 3, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. Fossil, Inc., No. 14-1856 (Fed. Cir. May 3, 2017).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1856-20170503
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1856-20170503

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.