Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 14-1802 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1802
Decided
December 16, 2015
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Precedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APPLE INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A KOREAN

CORPORATION, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS

AMERICA, INC., A NEW YORK CORPORATION,

SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,

LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY

COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees

2014-1802

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:12-cv-00630-LHK, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN,

HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

22 APPLE INC. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

O R D E R

Appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed a petition for rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellant Apple Inc. The petition and response were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal and a majority of the panel granted the petition for the limited purpose of amending the court’s opinion. Thereafter, the petition, response, and amended opinions were sent to the en banc court. IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (2) The mandate of the court will issue on December 23, 2015. FOR THE COURT

December 16, 2015 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 14-1802 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 16, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1802-20151216-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1802-20151216-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.