Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Glycobiosciences, Inc., No. 14-1793 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1793
Decided
July 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: GLYCOBIOSCIENCES, INC.,

Appellant 2014-1793

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,687.

JUDGMENT

JEROLD I. SCHNEIDER, Schneider Rothman IP Law Group, Boca Raton, FL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOEL B. ROTHMAN.

FRANCES LYNCH, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SARAH E. CRAVEN, NATHAN K. KELLEY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Glycobiosciences, Inc., No. 14-1793 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1793-20150710
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1793-20150710

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.