Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Avaya Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1782 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1782
Decided
August 10, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

AVAYA INC., DELL INC., SONY CORPORATION OF

AMERICA, HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.,

Appellants

v.

NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (formerly known as NETWORK-1 SECURITY SOLUTIONS,

INC.),

Appellee

2014-1782, 2014-1783, 2014-1784, 2014-1785

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00071, IPR2013-00385, IPR2013-00495.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY SANOK, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellant Avaya Inc. also represented by BRIAN M. KOIDE; SCOTT BITTMAN, New York, NY; JONATHAN M. LINDSAY, Irvine, CA.

THOMAS M. DUNHAM, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, for appellant Dell Inc. Also represented by

2JAMES MICHAEL WOODS; KIMBALL RICHARD ANDERSON, Chicago, IL; MICHAEL J. SCHEER, New York, NY.

LIONEL M. LAVENUE, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, for appellant Sony Corporation of America. Also represented by DANIEL CRAIG COOLEY.

ROBERT J. WALTERS, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, for appellant Hewlett-Packard Co. Also represented by DAVID HENRY DOLKAS, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, Menlo Park, CA. GREGORY S. DOVEL, Dovel & Luner, LLP, Santa Monica, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by SEAN LUNER.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 10, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Avaya Inc. v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1782 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1782-20150810
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1782-20150810

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.