Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., No. 14-1722 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 14, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1722
Decided
April 14, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MEDTRONIC INC.,

Appellant

v.

NUVASIVE, INC.,

Appellee

2014-1722

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,247.

JUDGMENT

JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by STEPHEN EDWARD BELISLE; NINA SHREVE, New York, NY.

MICHAEL T. ROSATO, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PAUL DAVID TRIPODI, II, Los Angeles, CA; CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., San Diego, CA; FRANK SCHERKENBACH, Boston, MA; STEPHEN REYNOLD SCHAEFER, MICHAEL J. KANE, Minneapolis, MN.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 14, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Medtronic Inc. v. Nuvasive, Inc., No. 14-1722 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 14, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1722-20150414
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1722-20150414

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.