Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SPX Corporation v. Pentair Sudmo GmbH, No. 14-1716 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1716
Decided
April 8, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SPX CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

PENTAIR SUDMO GMBH,

FKA SUDMO HOLDING GMBH,

Appellee

2014-1716

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,797, 95/001,834, 95/001,873.

JUDGMENT

JOHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Sigler LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALAN M. FISCH, ALICIA MEROS CARNEY.

MICHAEL A. LAVINE, St. Onge Steward Johnston & Reens, LLC, Stamford, CT, argued for appellee. Also represented by STEVEN B. SIMONIS, BENJAMIN J. LEHBERGER, WESLEY W. WHITMYER.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

es).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SPX Corporation v. Pentair Sudmo GmbH, No. 14-1716 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 8, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1716-20150408
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1716-20150408

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.