NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
REMBRANDT VISION TECHNOLOGIES, L.P.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
2014-1715
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 3:11-cv-00819-TJC-JRK, Judge Timothy J. Corrigan.
ON MOTION
Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and MOORE, Circuit
Judges.
O R D E R
Rembrandt Vision Technologies, L.P., moves without opposition to dismiss its appeal as premature. Rembrandt Vision Technologies also moves without opposition for a 30-day extension of time to file its opening brief.
22 REMBRANDT VISION TECHNOLOGIES v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON VISION CARE
Rembrandt had moved in the district court to set aside an earlier judgment, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). On July 10, 2014, the district court entered an order regarding the motion and stated "[i]t is the Court’s intention to deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Judgment" after other matters concerning fees and costs are determined. Rembrandt filed a protective notice of appeal, and now asks this court to dismiss the appeal as premature because the pending motion and fees and costs has not yet been finally decided. We agree that the matter remains pending before the district court.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to dismiss is granted. (2) The motion for an extension of time is denied as moot.
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 6, 2014 s25