Bobel v. ITC, No. 14-1701 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2015) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ANDRZEJ BOBEL, NEPTUN LIGHT, INC.,

Appellants

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

SATCO PRODUCTS, INC., MAXLITE, INC.,

LITETRONICS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Intervenors

2014-1701

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-872.

JUDGMENT

SUDIP KUMAR KUNDU, The Fuisz-Kundu Group LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN ROBERT FUISZ. ROBERT JOHN NEEDHAM, Office of General Counsel, International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by WAYNE W.

2HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, DOMINIC L. BIANCHI.

ROBERT STEPHEN RIGG, Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, IL, argued for intervenors. Intervenors Litetronics International, Inc., MaxLite, Inc., also represented by TIMOTHY MICHAEL NITSCH. Intervenor Satco Products, Inc., represented by ROBERT P. LYNN, JR., STEPHEN WILLIAM LIVINGSTON, Lynn, Gartner, Dunne & Covello, LLP, Mineola, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (O’MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2015 /s/Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

Bobel v. ITC, No. 14-1701 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2015).

Record ID

CAFC-14-1701-20150714

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1701-20150714

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.