Fed. Cir.

In re BIG Baboon, Inc., No. 14-1601 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 14-1601
Decided: March 6, 2015
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: BIG BABOON, INC.,

Appellant 2014-1601

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. 90/010,961.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD F. MUNZINGER, Shartsis Friese LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by LISA ANN JACOBS.

COKE STEWART, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, MOLLY R. SILFEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 6, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re BIG Baboon, Inc., No. 14-1601 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2015).

Record ID: CAFC-14-1601-20150306
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1601-20150306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error