Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Softview LLC v. Kyocera Corporation, No. 14-1599 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1599
Decided
February 9, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SOFTVIEW LLC,

Appellant

v.

KYOCERA CORPORATION, MOTOROLA

MOBILITY LLC,

Appellees

2014-1599

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00004, IPR2013-00257.

JUDGMENT

MORGAN CHU, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMUEL KAI LU, ALAN J. HEINRICH.

ERIC C. COHEN, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee Kyocera Corporation. Also represented by MICHAEL TOMSA, MICHAEL ADAM DORFMAN.

2JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Winston-Salem, NC, argued for appellee Motorola Mobility LLC. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES; DAVID A. REED, CANDICE C. DECAIRE, ALYSON L. WOOTEN, WILLIAM HENRY BOICE, Atlanta, GA; CHRISTOPHER SCHENCK, Seattle, WA.

JOSEPH MATAL, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, NATHAN K. KELLEY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and HUGHES, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Softview LLC v. Kyocera Corporation, No. 14-1599 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 9, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1599-20150209
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1599-20150209

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error