Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Hardy, No. 14-1577 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1577
Decided
April 17, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: CHRISTOPHER HARDY, R. NEAL POST,

Appellants 2014-1577

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 29/268,198.

JUDGMENT

PERRY J. SAIDMAN, Saidman DesignLaw Group, Silver Spring, MD, argued for appellants.

BRIAN THOMAS RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, WILLIAM LAMARCA, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 17, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Hardy, No. 14-1577 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1577-20150417
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1577-20150417

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.