Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Versata Computer Industry v. SAP AG, No. 14-1430 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1430
Decided
June 18, 2014
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VERSATA COMPUTER INDUSTRY SOLUTIONS,

INC., TRILOGY COMPUTER INDUSTRY

SOLUTIONS, INC., VERSATA DEVELOPMENT

GROUP, INC., FKA TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT

GROUP, INC., VERSATA SOFTWARE, INC., AND

TRILOGY SOFTWARE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SAP AG AND SAP AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2014-1430

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:07-cv-00153-RSP, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne.

ON MOTION

Before PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and MOORE, Circuit

Judges.

22 VERSATA COMPUTER INDUSTRY v. SAP AG

O R D E R

Appellees move to dismiss this appeal or summarily affirm the district court’s final judgment and orders on appeal in this case. Appellants oppose.

In a prior appeal in this case, this court affirmed the jury’s infringement verdict and damages award, vacated the permanent injunction as overbroad, and remanded for “the district court to enter an order that conforms to this [court’s] opinion.” On remand, appellees abandoned any right to injunctive relief, and the district court entered final judgment accordingly.

We have considered appellants’ arguments on appeal including their arguments regarding Rule 60 and their motion for a stay, but find them to be without merit.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted to the extent that this court summarily affirms. (2) Costs to Versata. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s30

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Versata Computer Industry v. SAP AG, No. 14-1430 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1430-20140618
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1430-20140618

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.