Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Escort Inc. v. Fleming, No. 14-1414 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1414
Decided
November 13, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ESCORT INC. AND BELTRONICS USA, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

HOYT A. FLEMING, III AND PARK, VAUGHAN

FLEMING & DOWLER LLP,

Defendants-Appellees.

2014-1414

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho in No. 1:12-cv-00064-BLW, Chief Judge B. Lynn Winmill.

JUDGMENT

BRETT A. SCHATZ, Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was GREGORY F. AHRENS.

MICHAEL S. DOWLER, Park Vaughan Fleming & Dowler, LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for defendants-appellees.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Escort Inc. v. Fleming, No. 14-1414 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 13, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1414-20141113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1414-20141113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.