Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gamecaster, Inc. v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., No. 14-1380 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2015)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1380
Decided
January 8, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GAMECASTER, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.,

Appellee.

2014-1380

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in reexamination No. 95/000,493.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK F. BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, P.C., of Glendale, California, argued for appellant.

CHARLES S. BARQUIST, Morrison & Foerster LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for appellee. On the brief were MARC A. HEARRON, of Washington, DC and CHRISTOPHER B. EIDE, of Palo Alto, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gamecaster, Inc. v. Dreamworks Animation SKG, Inc., No. 14-1380 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1380-20150108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1380-20150108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.