Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. K/S Himpp, No. 14-1357 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2015)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1357
Decided
January 8, 2015
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit HEAR-WEAR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Appellant,

v.

K/S HIMPP,

Appellee.

2014-1357

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,388.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN S. FRANKLIN, Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Of counsel on the brief was SHEILA KADURA, of Austin, Texas.

ROBERT GREENE STERNE, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were JON E. WRIGHT and JASON D. EISENBERG.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 8, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hear-Wear Technologies, LLC v. K/S Himpp, No. 14-1357 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1357-20150108
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1357-20150108

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error