Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

RE v. US, No. 14-1286 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1286
Decided
October 15, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KYLE RE, on

behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1286

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:13-cv-03518-WHA, Judge William H. Alsup.

JUDGMENT

S. CHANDLER VISHER, Law Offices of S. Chandler Visher, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

MICHAEL QUINN, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. On the brief were STUART F. DELERY, Assistant Attorney General, J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN, Director, and

2RUTH A. HARVEY, Assistant Director and ALICIA M. HUNT, Trial Attorney. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 15, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

RE v. US, No. 14-1286 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 15, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1286-20141015
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1286-20141015

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.