Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. Sears Holding Corporation, No. 14-1119 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2014)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1119
Decided
March 27, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit OPLUS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION,

Defendant,

AND

VIZIO, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

2014-1119, -1131

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:12-cv-05707-MRP-E, Senior Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.

ON MOTION

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to withdraw these appeals, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

22 OPLUS TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. v. SEARS HOLDING CORPORATION

(1) The motion is granted. The appeals are dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. (3) All pending motions are moot.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s19 ISSUED AS MANDATE: March 27, 2014

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Oplus Technologies, Ltd. v. Sears Holding Corporation, No. 14-1119 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 27, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1119-20140327
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1119-20140327

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.