Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Qcue, Inc. v. Digonex Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1028 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 14-1028
Decided
August 11, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

QCUE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DIGONEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

DIGONEX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

QCUE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2014-1028, -1029

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in Nos. 1:12-cv-00484-SS and 1:12-cv-00801-SS, Judge Sam Sparks.

JUDGMENT

2MICHAEL J. SACKSTEDER, Fenwick & West LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were DAVID D. SCHUMANN and JEFFREY A. WARE.

BARRY K. SHELTON, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP, of Austin, Texas, argued for appellee. On the brief were EDWARD A. CAVAZOS and BEN BERNELL. Of counsel was CONOR M. CIVINS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 11, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Qcue, Inc. v. Digonex Technologies, Inc., No. 14-1028 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 11, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-14-1028-20140811
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-14-1028-20140811

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.