Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Lang, No. 13-1639 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1639
Decided
August 13, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE KEVIN W. LANG AND JAMES W. DIBBLE

2013-1639

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Serial No. 12/856,501.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN D. BALL, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellants. Of counsel was RICHARD C. PETTUS.

JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Lang, No. 13-1639 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 13, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1639-20140813
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1639-20140813

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.