Fed. Cir.

Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank, No. 13-1626 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 30, 2013)

General / Procedural

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 13-1626
Decided: December 30, 2013
Judge: See opinion
Document: Nonprecedential Opinion
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit JAMES E. ZABLOSKY AND KAREN ZABLOSKY,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

MIDFIRST BANK AND MIDLAND MORTGAGE CO.,

Defendants-Appellees,

AND

SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN

DEVELOPMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1626

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in No. 13-CV-0467, Senior Judge Harry Lee Hudspeth.

O R D E R

Having received no objection to this court’s November 25, 2013 order, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

22 ZABLOSKY v. MIDFIRST BANK

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Zablosky v. Midfirst Bank, No. 13-1626 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 30, 2013).

Record ID: CAFC-13-1626-20131230
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1626-20131230

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error