Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, No. 13-1564 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2015)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1564
Decided
April 29, 2015
Judge
See opinion
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SCA HYGIENE PRODUCTS AKTIEBOLAG

AND SCA PERSONAL CARE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS, LLC,

FIRST QUALITY HYGIENIC, INC.,

FIRST QUALITY PRODUCTS, INC. AND

FIRST QUALITY RETAIL SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees

2013-1564

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky in No. 10-CV-0122, Chief Judge Joseph H. McKinley, Jr.

O R D E R

Oral argument en banc for this appeal is scheduled for June 19, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom 201. This appeal will have 30 minutes per side for a total argument time of one hour. The parties shall notify the2 2 SCA HYGIENE PRODUCTS v. FIRST QUALITY BABY PRODUCTS

court by ECF filing by May 20, 2015 of the names of the counsel who will present oral argument. FOR THE COURT

April 29, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, No. 13-1564 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 29, 2015).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1564-20150429
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1564-20150429

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error