Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Schwindt v. Miller, No. 13-1563 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1563
Decided
May 8, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit JEFFREY SCHWINDT, MICHAEL E. MILLER,

JOSEPH L. MARK, JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND

CHARLES BUTCHER,

Appellants,

v.

MICHAEL E. MILLER, JOSEPH L. MARK,

JOHN P. HANCOCK, AND CHARLES BUTCHER,

Appellees. 2013-1563

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Interference No. 105,805.

JUDGMENT

JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, Hunton & Williams LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT M. SCHULMAN and CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN.

LISA J. PIROZZOLO, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for appellees.

2With her on the brief were MARK C. FLEMING; DAVID L. CAVANAUGH and OWEN K. ALLEN, of Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 8, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Schwindt v. Miller, No. 13-1563 (Fed. Cir. May 8, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1563-20140508
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1563-20140508

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.