Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. REA, No. 13-1540 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 20, 2013)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1540
Decided
December 20, 2013
Judge
Linn, J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

TERESA STANEK REA, ACTING DIRECTOR,

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

OFFICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

2013-1540

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 12-CV-0687, Judge Leonie M. Brinkema.

ON MOTION

Before MOORE, LINN, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia due to settlement.

22 DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC. v. REA

Pursuant to the settlement agreement, the parties move to remand the appeal to the district court. The parties also ask that we instruct the district court to remand U.S. application no. 09/970,772 (“the ‘772 application”) to the United States Patent and Trademark Office to enable Disney Enterprises, Inc. to file a request for continued examination of the ‘772 application and to consider amended claims and new evidence consistent with the April 11, 2013 and June 3, 2013 decisions of the district court. The parties state that the proposed remand leaves intact the district court’s determination that Disney is not entitled to a reissue patent for claims 1-22, 90-119, 123-130, 132-143, and 145-146 in the ‘772 application.

We grant the motion to the extent that we remand to permit the parties to file a motion with the district court to remand to the Patent Office.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to remand is granted to the extent explained above.

(2) Pursuant to the parties' agreement, Disney shall pay the expenses of the proceeding, totaling $91,609. Of that $91,609, Disney shall pay $84,928.20 to the United States Patent and Trademark Office and $6,680.80 to the Department of Justice. FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s25 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 20, 2013

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. REA, No. 13-1540 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 20, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1540-20131220
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1540-20131220

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.