Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re SUK KAN OH, No. 13-1321 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1321
Decided
December 6, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE SUK KAN OH

(Real Party in Interest Zinus Inc.)

2013-1321

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Serial No. 12/589,961.

JUDGMENT

DARIEN K. WALLACE, Imperium Patent Works LLP, of Pleasanton, California, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was T. LESTER WALLACE.

JAMIE L. SIMPSON, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Acting Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PROST, and HUGHES,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 6, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re SUK KAN OH, No. 13-1321 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 6, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1321-20131206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1321-20131206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error