Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Bennett Marine, Inc. v. Lenco Marine, Inc., No. 13-1297 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2013)

Reversed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1297
Decided
December 11, 2013
Judge
Rader, C.J.
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BENNETT MARINE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LENCO MARINE, INC., RICHARD DEVITO, JR.,

AND RINKER BOAT COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

KIM SLOCUM,

Defendant.

2013-1297

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in No. 04-CV-60326, Judge Kenneth A. Marra.

ON MOTION

Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges.

2BENNETT MARINE, INC. V. LENCO MARINE, INC. 2

O R D E R

Lenco Marine, Inc., Richard Devito, Jr., and Rinker Boat Company (collectively “Appellants”) respond to the court’s June 5, 2013 order staying proceedings in this appeal pending the final disposition of Bennett Marine, Inc. v. Lenco Marine, Inc., No. 2012-1336, -1354 (the “Related Appeals”). Appellants move unopposed to lift the stay and request this appeal be summarily disposed of consistent with the rulings of the panel in the Related Appeal.

The Related Appeals are from the same district court case. In the Related Appeals, on September 29, 2013 a panel of this court reversed the district court’s finding of infringement, including willful infringement. As a result, the appellant asserts without opposition that there is no longer any basis for the award of attorney fees and costs, which is the issue raised by this appeal.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to lift proceedings in 2013-1297 is granted.

(2) The motion for summary disposition is granted. The district court’s fees and costs judgment is reversed. (3) Each side shall bear its own costs in this appeal.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court s25

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Bennett Marine, Inc. v. Lenco Marine, Inc., No. 13-1297 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1297-20131211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1297-20131211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.