Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Microsoft Corporation v. Datatern, Inc., No. 13-1184 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2014)

Vacated & Remanded
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1184
Decided
May 5, 2014
Judge
Moore, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DATATERN, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

2013–1184

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 11–CV–2365, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

SAP AG, AND SAP AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

DATATERN, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

2013–1185

22 MICROSOFT CORPORATION v. DATATERN, INC.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 11–CV–2648, Judge Katherine B. Forrest.

SUA SPONTE

Before PROST and MOORE, Circuit Judges.1

O R D E R

The original panel opinion decided on April 4, 2014 in the above-identified appeals is hereby vacated. A new decision is forthcoming and the time for rehearing petitions will begin anew. No additional briefing or argument is necessary at this time. FOR THE COURT

May 5, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Footnotes

  1. 1 Chief Judge Rader is recused and takes no part in this order.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Microsoft Corporation v. Datatern, Inc., No. 13-1184 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1184-20140505
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1184-20140505

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.