Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Motorola Mobility LLC [Rule 36 Judgment] Corrected 9/16, 12:30PM, No. 13-1133 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1133
Decided
September 16, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

2013-1133

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/010,890.

CORRECTED JUDGMENT

SCOTT A. MCKEOWN, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, L.L.P., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant.

MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit

Judges).*

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 16, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Footnotes

  1. ↩ * Judgment corrected to reflect correct panel members.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Motorola Mobility LLC [Rule 36 Judgment] Corrected 9/16, 12:30PM, No. 13-1133 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1133-20130916
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1133-20130916

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error