Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 13-1058 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2014)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1058
Decided
March 18, 2014
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GABRIEL TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, AND

TRACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

QUALCOMM INCORPORATED, SNAPTRACK, INC.,

AND NORMAN KRASNER,

Defendants-Appellees.

2013-1058

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 08-CV-1992, Judge Anthony J. Battaglia.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. SALZMAN, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was RONALD ABRAMSON. Of counsel was PETER A. SULLIVAN.

TIMOTHY S. TETER, Cooley LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JEFFREY S. KARR and LORI R. MASON, of Palo

2Alto, California, and STEVEN M. STRAUSS, of San Diego, California. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 18, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gabriel Technologies Corp. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 13-1058 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2014).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1058-20140318
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1058-20140318

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.