Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re LG Display Co., Ltd., No. 13-1055 (Fed. Cir. July 22, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 13-1055
Decided
July 22, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE LG DISPLAY CO., LTD.

2013-1055

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/008,143.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT S. RIGG, Vedder Price P.C., of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY NITSCH; and REBECCA G. RUDICH, of Washington, DC.

MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and WILLIAM LAMARCA, Associate Solicitor. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

2PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, BRYSON, and PROST, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT July 22, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re LG Display Co., Ltd., No. 13-1055 (Fed. Cir. July 22, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-13-1055-20130722
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-13-1055-20130722

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error