Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Scottrade, Inc., No. 12-M109 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2012)

Granted
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-M109
Decided
January 13, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

Note: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE SCOTTRADE, INC.,

Petitioner.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 109

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.in case no. 10-CV-320, Chief Judge David J. Folsom.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Petitioner Scottrade, Inc. and Respondent Ganas, LLC jointly move to withdraw Scottrade’s petition for writ of mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

Upon consideration thereof, Ir Is ORDERED THAT: The motion to withdraw Scottrade’s petition for writ of mandamus is granted.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2IN RE SCOTTRADE 2

For THE Court JAN 1 3 2012 /

s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: Jason M. Schwent, Esq.

Zachariah Spear Harrington, Esq. Clerk, United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas 825

FILED

AALP CPIERACLUSI TFOR US A FEDER

JAN 13 2012

HORBALY aa

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Scottrade, Inc., No. 12-M109 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-M109-20120113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-M109-20120113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error