Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re TD Ameritrade, Inc., No. 12-M107 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2012)

Dismissed
General / Procedural
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-M107
Decided
June 21, 2012
Judge
See opinion
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

Nore: This order is nonprecedential. Gnited States Court of Appeals

for the federal Circuit

IN RE TD AMERITRADE, INC.,

Petitioner. ‘

Miscellaneous Docket No. 107

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 10-CV-320, Chief Judge David Folsom.

ON PETITION

ORDER

Upon consideration of TD Ameritrade, Inc.’s withdrawal of its petition for writ of mandamus,

It Is ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to withdraw the petition for a writ of mandamus is granted. The petition is dismissed.

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

2IN RE TD AMERITRADE 2

For THE COURT JUN 2 1 2012 ‘sf Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

ce: Michael Hawes, Esq.

Zachariah Spear Harrington, Esq. Clerk, United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Texas 825

Us. count HPAPPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT JUN 21 2ut2

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re TD Ameritrade, Inc., No. 12-M107 (Fed. Cir. June 21, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-M107-20120621
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-M107-20120621

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error