Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., No. 12-1638 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2013)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1638
Decided
February 20, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VICTOR STANLEY, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CREATIVE PIPE, INC., AND MARK T. PAPPAS,

Defendants-Appellants,

AND

STEPHANIE E. PAPPAS, AND JOHN DOE,

(also known as Fred Bass)

Defendants.

2012-1638

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in No. 06-CV-2662, Judge Marvin J. Garbis.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT B. WOLINSKY, Hogan Lovells US, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee.

2JOSHUA J. KAUFMAN, Venable, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. Of counsel on the brief was JAMES A. ROTHSCHILD, Anderson, Coe & King, LLP, of Baltimore, Maryland. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, Circuit Judges, and

DAVIS,* Chief District Judge).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 20, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Footnotes

  1. ↩ * Honorable Leonard Davis, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, sitting by designation.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Victor Stanley, Inc. v. Creative Pipe, Inc., No. 12-1638 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1638-20130220
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1638-20130220

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error