Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 12-1593 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2013)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1593
Decided
May 29, 2013
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order on Motion
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND

NEVADA INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND MARINER

ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC,

Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1593, -1618

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 06-CV-2182, Chief Judge Roslyn O. Silver.

INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND

NEVADA INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY

CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs- Appellants,

v.

RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND MARINER

ACQUISITION COMPANY LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

2INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. RUDOLPH 2 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

2012-1665

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona in No. 06-CV-2182, Chief Judge Roslyn O. Silver.

ON MOTION

O R D E R

Integrated Technology Corporation and Nevada Integrated Technology Corporation move without opposition to withdraw their cross-appeal, No. 2012-1665.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to withdraw 2012-1665 is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2012-1665. (3) The revised official caption for 2012-1593, -1618 is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

33 INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGY CORP. v. RUDOLPH

TECHNOLOGIES, INC. s25 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 2012-1665 Only): May 29, 2013

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Integrated Technology Corp. v. Rudolph Technologies, Inc., No. 12-1593 (Fed. Cir. May 29, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1593-20130529
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1593-20130529

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.