Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 12-1506 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2012)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1506
Decided
September 28, 2012
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb ~tate~ <!Court of §ppeaI~

for tbe jfeberaI <!Circuit

APPLE INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,

Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1506

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in case no. 11-CV-1846, Judge Lucy H. Koh.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON, PROST and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. move for a lim ited remand for the purpose of permitting the United States District Court for the Northern District of Califor-2APPLE INC. V SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 2 nia to consider Samsung's motion to dissolve the prelimi nary injunction. Apple Inc. opposes the motion.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

We grant the motion and remand for the purpose of allowing the trial court to consider Samsung's motion and Apple's arguments in opposition thereto. The appeal is held in abeyance pending further ruling from the trial court. The parties are to inform this court promptly of the trial court's ruling on the motion and propose how they believe the appeal should proceed in light of such ruling.

In granting the motion, the Federal Circuit takes no position on the proceedings the trial court should employ in considering the motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction or on the merits of the motion.

Accordingly, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion to remand is granted. The court retains jurisdiction over the appeal at this time.

FOR THE COURT

SEP 282012

/s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc~ Kathleen M. Sullivan, Esq.

COUftf~IfJPEALS u.s. FOR Michael A. Jacobs, Esq.

1lfEFEDERAL CIRCUIT s19

SEP 282012

JANHORBALY

LURK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 12-1506 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1506-20120928
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1506-20120928

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.