Panduit Corp. v. REA, No. 12-1437 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2013) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PANDUIT CORPORATION,

Appellant,

TERESA STANEK REA, Acting Director, United

States Patent and Trademark Office,

Appellee,

AND

ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS,

Cross Appellant.

2012-1437, -1438

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,413.

JUDGMENT

JESSE O. COLLIER, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief

2were JAMES A. OLIFF, JOHN W. O’MEARA, and ERIC D. MOREHOUSE.

COKE MORGAN STEWART, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief was ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. Of counsel were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, Associate Solicitor.

PHILIP P. CASPERS, Carlson Caspers Vandenburgh Lindquist & Schuman, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellant. With him on the brief were TIMOTHY A. LINDQUIST, SAMUEL A. HAMER, and JOSEPH W. WINKELS.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and PROST,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 12, 2013 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

Panduit Corp. v. REA, No. 12-1437 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 12, 2013).

Record ID

CAFC-12-1437-20130812

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1437-20130812

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.