Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Heflin v. Coleman Music and Entertainment, LLC., No. 12-1287 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1287
Decided
December 10, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

D. KEITH HEFLIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COLEMAN MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT, LLC

and GARY B. COLEMAN, JR.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1287

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 10-CV-0566, Judge Robert G. Doumar.

JUDGMENT

JOHN F. TRIGGS, Waddey & Patterson, P.C., of Nashville, Tennessee, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MARK J. PATTERSON and PAUL NEY. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN B. MUMFORD, JR., Hancock, Daniel, Johnson & Nagle, P.C., of Glen Allen, Virginia.

2ELIZABETH G. BORLAND, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief was DALE LISCHER. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2012 /s Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Heflin v. Coleman Music and Entertainment, LLC., No. 12-1287 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1287-20121210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1287-20121210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.