Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wi-Lan, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 12-1273 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1273
Decided
December 11, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WI-LAN, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LG ELECTRONICS, INC. and

LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1273

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in case no. 10-CV-0432, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan.

JUDGMENT

DAVID E. SIPIORA, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was MATTHEW C. HOLOHAN. Of counsel on the brief was RICHARD S. MEYER, Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, of Washington, DC.

RICHARD D. HARRIS, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JEFFREY G. MOTE, JAMES J. LUKAS, JR., and ERIC J. MAIERS. Of counsel was RICHARD A. EDLIN, of New York, New York.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wi-Lan, Inc. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 12-1273 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1273-20121211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1273-20121211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.