Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., No. 12-1258 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1258
Decided
December 5, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CROWN PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND

CROWN CORK & SEAL USA, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BALL METAL BEVERAGE CONTAINER

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1258

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in case no. 05-CV-0281, Judge Walter H. Rice.

JUDGMENT

DALE M. HEIST, Woodcock Washburn LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ALBERT J. MARVELLINO and AARON B. RABINOWITZ.

JOHN D. LUKEN, Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP, of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was JOSHUA A. LORENTZ.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 5, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbay Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Crown Packaging Technology, Inc. v. Ball Metal Beverage Container Corp., No. 12-1258 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 5, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1258-20121205
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1258-20121205

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.