Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Mondis Tech v. HON HAI Precision, No. 12-1208 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1208
Decided
February 20, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD.,

ALSO KNOWN AS FOXCONN INNOLUX DISPLAY CORP., LITE-ON TECHNOLOGY CORP., LITE-ON TRADING USA, INC., TPV TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,

INNOLUX CORP., AND CHIMEI INNOLUX

CORPORATION, FORMERLY KNOWN AS

INNOLUX

DISPLAY CORPORATION,

Defendants,

AND

TPV INTERNATIONAL (USA), INC.,

TPV ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD.,

ENVISION PERIPHERALS INC.,

TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (FUJIAN) CO. LTD.,

AND

TOP VICTORY ELECTRONICS (TAIWAN) CO. LTD.,

Defendants-Appellants.

2012-1208

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 07-CV-0565 and 08- CV-0478, Judge Rodney Gilstrap.

JUDGMENT

MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and Vincent A. Gallo.

JONATHAN D. HACKER, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was JOSHUA DEAHL. Of counsel on the brief were MARK A. SAMUELS and BRIAN BERLINER, of Los Angeles, California, and MICHAEL L. MYERS of Newport Beach, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 20, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Mondis Tech v. HON HAI Precision, No. 12-1208 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 20, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1208-20130220
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1208-20130220

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.