Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Almondet, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 12-1203 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1203
Decided
November 20, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALMONDNET, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MICROSOFT CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1203

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case no. 10-CV-0298, Senior Judge Barbara B. Crabb.

JUDGMENT

DAVID K. CALLAHAN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were MEREDITH ZINANNI and RYAN POHLMAN.

ROBERT N. HOCHMAN, Sidley Austin, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were CONSTANTINE L. TRELA, JR., RICHARD A. CEDEROTH, and NATHANIEL C. LOVE, of Chicago, Illinois, and BRYAN K. ANDERSON, of Palo Alto, California. Of

2counsel on the brief was DAVID E. KILLOUGH, Microsoft Corporation, of Redmond, Washington. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 20, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Almondet, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., No. 12-1203 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 20, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1203-20121120
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1203-20121120

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.