Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Resqnet.Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc., No. 12-1189 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 2012)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1189
Decided
September 20, 2012
Judge
O'Malley, J.
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Gntted States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

RESQNET.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

Vv.

LANSA, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

2012-1189, -1190

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in case no. 01-CV-3578, Senior Judge Robert W. Sweet. Before BRYSON, MOORE and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges.

Figure on page 1 of the opinion

ORDER

The parties jointly move to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York due to settlement.

The parties state they have settled the case and requested an indicative ruling indicating from the district court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1, whether the district court would defer, deny, or grant a motion to vacate the underlying judgment if the case were remanded. The2 RESQNET.COM v. LANSA 2 district court indicated pursuant to Rule 62.1(a)(3) that it would grant the motion.

Figure on page 2 of the opinion

In remanding this case to the District Court to consider the motion for vacatur, the Federal Circuit takes no position as to whether the District Court should grant the motion for vacatur.

Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted.

FOR THE COURT

SEP 20 2012

/s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc: James H. Hulme Esq.

Jeffrey I. Kaplan, Esq.

s25

SEP 20 2012

Issued As A Mandate:

ung rans

SEP 20 2012

JAN HORBALY

CLERK

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Resqnet.Com, Inc. v. Lansa, Inc., No. 12-1189 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1189-20120920
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1189-20120920

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.