Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nuclimate AIR Quality Systems, Inc. v. Airtex Manufacturing Partnership, No. 12-1184 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1184
Decided
October 5, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NUCLIMATE AIR QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.,

and JAMES MILLER,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

AIRTEX MANUFACTURING PARTNERSHIP

(successor in interest to M & I Heat Transfer

Products, Ltd.),

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1184

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York in Case No. 08-CV-0317, Judge Glenn T. Suddaby.

JUDGMENT

LAURA W. SMALLEY, Harris Beach PLLC, of Pittsford, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With her on the brief was NEAL L. SLIFKIN.

JAMES J. MEREK, Merek, Blackmon & Voorhees, LLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief was DAVID H. VOORHEES.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 5, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nuclimate AIR Quality Systems, Inc. v. Airtex Manufacturing Partnership, No. 12-1184 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 5, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1184-20121005
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1184-20121005

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.