Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Flashpoint Technology, Inc. v. ITC, No. 12-1149 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1149
Decided
February 14, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLASHPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee,

AND

HTC CORPORATION, AND HTC AMERICA, INC.,

Intervenors.

2012-1149

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-726.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM D. BELANGER, Pepper Hamilton LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief were ALEXANDRA C. FENNELL and GREGORY D. LEN, Of counsel on the brief were GOUTAM PATNAIK and TUHIN GANGULY, of Washington, DC. Of counsel were SANDRA J. BADIN, MICHAEL C. NEWMAN and JAMES M. WODARSKI, of Boston, Massachusetts.

2JIA CHEN, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, Acting General Counsel, and WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Assistant General Counsel. Of counsel was MICHELLE KLANCNIK.

JOHN P. SCHNURER, Perkins Coie, LLP, of San Diego, California, argued for intervenors. With him on the brief were JAMES B. COUGHLAN, of Washington, DC, and DAN L. BAGATELL, of Phoenix, Arizona, and KENNETH J. HALPERN, of Palo Alto, California.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 14, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flashpoint Technology, Inc. v. ITC, No. 12-1149 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 14, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1149-20130214
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1149-20130214

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.