Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

R+L Carriers v. Pitt Ohio, No. 12-1142 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 25, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1142
Decided
January 25, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE BILL OF LADING TRANSMISSION AND

PROCESSING SYSTEM PATENT LITIGATION

R+L CARRIERS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PITT OHIO EXPRESS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1142

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in No. 09-MD-2050 and 10-CV-0090, Chief Judge Sandra S. Beckwith.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY C. WHITE, Thompson Hine, LLP, of Columbus, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was MEGAN D. DORTENZO, of Cleveland, Ohio. Of counsel was TROY S. PRINCE, of Cleveland, Ohio.

GRETCHEN L. JANKOWSKI, Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief was MICHAEL L. DEVER.

2THIS CAUSE HAVING BEEN HEARD AND CONSIDERED, IT IS

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 25, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

R+L Carriers v. Pitt Ohio, No. 12-1142 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 25, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1142-20130125
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1142-20130125

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.