Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Monsanto Co. v. David, No. 12-1128 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1128
Decided
November 15, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MONSANTO COMPANY AND MONSANTO

TECHNOLOGY LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

LOREN DAVID,

Defendant-Appellant.

2012-1128

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in Case No. 04-CV-0425, Judge Henry E. Autrey.

JUDGMENT

MARK G. ARNOLD, Husch Blackwell, LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief was JOSEPH C. ORLET.

PAUL A. SORTLAND, Sortland Law Office, PLLC, of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for defendant-appellant.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges.

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 15, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Monsanto Co. v. David, No. 12-1128 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 15, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1128-20121115
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1128-20121115

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.