Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Allied Machine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc., No. 12-1119 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2012)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1119
Decided
August 9, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ALLIED MACHINE & ENGINEERING

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

COMPETITIVE CARBIDE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1119

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in No. 10-CV-0773, Judge Christopher A. Boyko.

JUDGMENT

R. ERIC GAUM, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SCOTT M. OLDHAM and WILLIAM S. NABORS.

ROBERT W. MCINTYRE, McIntrye, Kahn & Kruse Co., L.P.A., of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and

LOURIE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Allied Machine & Engineering Corp. v. Competitive Carbide, Inc., No. 12-1119 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 9, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1119-20120809
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1119-20120809

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error