Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. v. Sony Electronics Inc., No. 12-1110 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1110
Decided
August 10, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TRANS VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SONY ELECTRONICS INC., SONY CORPORATION

OF AMERICA, SONY COMPUTER

ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA INC.,

SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT INC., and

SONY CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1110, -1134

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 09-CV-3304, Judge Edward M. Chen.

JUDGMENT

JOHN F. SWEENEY, Locke Lord LLP, of New York, New York, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were ZACHARY D. SILBERSHER and JOSEPH A. FARCO. Of counsel was RENE A. VAZQUEZ, Sinergia Technology Law Group, PLLC, of Marlborough, Connecticut.

WALTER E. HANLEY, JR. Kenyon & Kenyon, LLP, of New York, New York, argued defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were JOHN FLOCK, MEGAN WHYMAN OLESEK, and BRETT N. WATKINS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

August 10, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. v. Sony Electronics Inc., No. 12-1110 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 10, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1110-20120810
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1110-20120810

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.