Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Collegenet, Inc. v. Marketlinx, Inc., No. 12-1083 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2012)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1083
Decided
June 19, 2012
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

COLLEGENET, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MARKETLINX, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1083

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas in Case No. 09-CV-0544, Judge Sam Sparks.

JUDGMENT

JOHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, of Portland, Oregon, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was STEPHEN J. JONCUS.

FLOYD R. NATION, Winston & Strawn, LLP, of Houston, Texas, argued for the defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was MERRITT D. WESTCOTT.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 19, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Collegenet, Inc. v. Marketlinx, Inc., No. 12-1083 (Fed. Cir. June 19, 2012).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1083-20120619
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1083-20120619

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.