Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft, No. 12-1066 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2013)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 12-1066
Decided
March 1, 2013
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ACTSOFT, INC.,

OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.

AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND

EQUIPMENT, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

2012-1066

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and 08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were PHILIP S. LORENZO and JAMES E. DALLNER.

2KYLE B. FLEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were TODD R. TUCKER and NICHOLAS J. GINGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee & Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 1, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Alcohol Monitoring v. Actsoft, No. 12-1066 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 1, 2013).

Record ID
CAFC-12-1066-20130301
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1066-20130301

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.