Fed. Cir.

Flash Seats, LLC. v. Paciolan, Inc., No. 12-1053 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2012)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 12-1053
Decided: June 8, 2012
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

FLASH SEATS, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

PACIOLAN, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

2012-1053, -1093

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 07-CV-0575, Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

BRIAN T. MORIARTY, Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, PC, of Concord, Massachusetts, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

CLEMENT S. ROBERTS, Durie Tangri LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were DARALYN J. DURIE and EUGENE NOVIKOV.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 8, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Flash Seats, LLC. v. Paciolan, Inc., No. 12-1053 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2012).

Record ID: CAFC-12-1053-20120608
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-12-1053-20120608

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 14, 2026 · Report an error